"Robert M.Zigweid" wrote: > I'll admit to being mostly a lurker here, but isn't the point of /sbin > to be statically linked. That's what the 's' stands for? > > Second question. This seems to imply that /sbin and /bin both have to > have the same behavior? I have no problem with /bin being dynamically > linked, but what if I want /bin to be dynamic and /sbin static? Since sbin on System V predated shared libraries on System V, I think maybe this is a reverse assignment of a meaning to the 's'. -- TerryReceived on Mon Nov 17 2003 - 09:10:55 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:29 UTC