Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh

From: boyd, rounin <boyd_at_insultant.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 00:23:22 +0100
> So.. forking a dynamic sh is roughly 40% more expensive than
> forking a static copy of sh.  This is embarrassing.

read the original paper carefully:


http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/cache/papers/cs/3066/http:zSzzSzswt-www.informatik.uni-hamburg.dezSz~1friedrizSzsvzSzreferenceszSzShared_Libraries_In_Sun_OS.pdf/gingell87shared.pdf

it's conclusions state that they are slower.  this was the
_original paper_ that announced the damn things.
Received on Mon Nov 24 2003 - 14:26:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:30 UTC