Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh

From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin_at_cs.duke.edu>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:57:56 -0500 (EST)
Jacques A. Vidrine writes:
 > 
 > So can we just have a statically linked /bin/sh and get on with life?

That certainly seems like the best compromise.   Then we can end this
thread ;)

 > That seems to have the most impact.  We can also expend our efforts
 > to improve dynamic linking performance, since that will improve the
 > performance of the other 99.9% of the universe.
 > 

What happened to mdodd's prebinding efforts?

Drew
Received on Tue Nov 25 2003 - 06:58:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:31 UTC