At 11:50 AM -0800 2003/11/25, Matthew Dillon wrote: > ... Or you can build an IPC mechanism that implements the PAM > functionality and then have programs which would otherwise use PAM > instead use the IPC mechanism. Which is the whole point of having > the IPC mechanism in the first place. That all sounds wonderful! So, when are you going to deliver this fully functioning and debugged code for inclusion in FreeBSD-5.2? -- Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles_at_skynet.be> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania. GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+ !w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++) tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)Received on Tue Nov 25 2003 - 14:10:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:31 UTC