Re: NSS and PAM, dynamic vs. static (was: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh)

From: David O'Brien <dev-null_at_nuxi.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 18:46:59 -0800

On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 02:00:08AM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
> As a user, I like /rescue better than the step-child that /stand/* used
> to be. It's part of the world, which /stand wasn't.

Except that we still have /stand.  It should be shot, but some won't let
it go...

Received on Tue Nov 25 2003 - 17:47:17 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Marcel Moolenaar: "Re: rtld + static linking"
Previous message: Larry Rosenman: "Re: Modem(PCMCIA) works on 4.8, hangs machine on 5.2-BETA"
In reply to: Matthias Andree: "NSS and PAM, dynamic vs. static (was: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh)"
Next in thread: Matthias Andree: "Re: NSS and PAM, dynamic vs. static (was: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh)"
Reply: Matthias Andree: "Re: NSS and PAM, dynamic vs. static (was: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:31 UTC