On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 02:00:08AM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: > Matthew Dillon <dillon_at_apollo.backplane.com> writes: > > > How much do you intend to use NSS for? I mean, what's the point of > > adopting this cool infrastructure if all you are going to do with it > > is make a better PAM out of it? > > The important thing is that NSS allows to plug modules such as LDAP or > PostgreSQL for user base management. PAM is only halfway there and > doesn't give libc et al. a notion of a user or group context (in spite > of its "account" context), NSS does. One might discuss if PAM is really > needed with NSS in place, but it's hard to think of a system without > NSS and removing PAM now doesn't look right. NSS and PAM do not overlap. They are complimentary and one cannot do the job of the other. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine NTT/Verio SME FreeBSD UNIX Heimdal nectar_at_celabo.org jvidrine_at_verio.net nectar_at_freebsd.org nectar_at_kth.seReceived on Wed Nov 26 2003 - 04:04:07 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:31 UTC