On Saturday 29 November 2003 05:57, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy_at_hub.org> writes: > > as to ntpd/timed ... don't run either ... run ntpdate twice a day (11:59 > > and 23:59) > > Don't Do That. It will lead to all kinds of trouble that will take > you ages to figure out. Really, ntpd is so ridiculously easy to set > up (especially if you already have ntpdate working) that there is no > reason not to use it. FWIW, it can reproduce this on two machines (one 4.9-RELEASE, one 5.1-RELEASE) which both run ntpd. Takes some 10 minutes on both before the first steps backwards turn up. Unfortunately, both machines aren't very good datapoints because both have pretty customized kernels and have -Os and -march optimized worlds/kernels... Both have kern.timecounter.hardware: ACPI-fast, too. -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi_at_freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:31 UTC