Re: bash2 linked dynamically

From: David O'Brien <obrien_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:48:45 -0800

On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 09:27:03PM -0800, Sean McNeil wrote:
> Also, I do not see any reason why bash should remain linked -static
> for -current.

Lucky for me (who wants a static Bash), I don't have to make the
decission -- ports are frozen and have been for a while.

Received on Sun Nov 30 2003 - 20:48:47 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Sean McNeil: "problem with kerberos startup and LDAP"
Previous message: Robert Watson: "Re: Ports startup scripts in /etc/rc.d (Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues)"
In reply to: Sean McNeil: "bash2 linked dynamically"
Next in thread: Leo Bicknell: "Re: bash2 linked dynamically"
Reply: Leo Bicknell: "Re: bash2 linked dynamically"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:32 UTC