On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 05:06:52PM -0800, Frank Mayhar wrote: > Daniel O'Connor wrote: > > What _REAL WORLD_ task does this slow down? > > I think the point was that, in this particular "worst" case, it's a forty > percent performance hit. What's the average case? What's the case for a > "real world" pipeline with a lot of tiny little static binaries? > > I dislike this decision enough that I'm actually considering going away > from FreeBSD, something I really had never for a moment thought possible. > (snip) >> >> If it is for you then just build your world with static root. > > Kind of defeats the purpose, don't you think? > Let's see. You dislike the dynamic root decision enough that you are considering the abandonment of FreeBSD. Then when you're told that you can still build a static root if you need/want it, you make a sarcastic remark. Would you some ice cream while you eat your cake? -- SteveReceived on Mon Nov 24 2003 - 16:34:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:40 UTC