Re: Improvements to fsck performance in -current ...?

From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander_at_Leidinger.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 16:53:15 +0200
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 07:22:58 -0700
Steve Kargl <sgk_at_troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 01:19:26PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:25:06 -0700
> > Steve Kargl <sgk_at_troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> > 
> > > As soon as Kirk committed the snapshot capability, snapshot became available
> > > on UFS1.  The only requirement is softupdates and softupdates pre-dates
> > > UFS2. 
> > 
> > Snapshots are available in 4.9? I thought it's not only about the FS
> > structure, it's about the code in -current (which is much different from
> > the 4.x code).
> > 
> 
> I wrote snapshots require softupdates.  How you jumped
> to the conclusion that 4.x has snapshots is beyond me.
> My truck has a 4-speed manual transmission, therefore
> all trucks have 4-speed manual transmissions.

I've read a "committed ... to RELENG_4, snapshot" because I had the
impression we talked about RELENG_4.

Sorry,
Alexander.

-- 
                      Loose bits sink chips.

http://www.Leidinger.net                       Alexander _at_ Leidinger.net
  GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91  3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
Received on Wed Oct 01 2003 - 05:53:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:24 UTC