Re: Improvements to fsck performance in -current ...?

Bill Moran wrote:

[...]

> To me, this means:
> a) if you want reliable, don't use IDE with WC

Reducable of 'don't use IDE' :-)

> b) if you want reliable and fast, don't use IDE, period, use SCSI.

If you look at the recent postings, SCSI didn't help
you out everytime. I use the fileserver in current
configuration for nearly 5 years, and only once this
happend, each other case all filesystems including
hold data was recoverable.

Jens