I'm finally motivated to ask, why don't security advisories contain the equivalent revs for -head? Surely I can't be the only person following -current who doesn't build every day. This notable omission has been true of every security advisory I can remember, and I've never understood it. If I'm missing some logic that makes it the right thing to do, can somebody please enlighten me? Thanks, Barney ----- Forwarded message from FreeBSD Security Advisories <security-advisories_at_freebsd.org> ----- VI. Correction details The following list contains the revision numbers of each file that was corrected in FreeBSD. Branch Revision Path - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- RELENG_4 src/sys/i386/linux/linprocfs/linprocfs_misc.c 1.3.2.9 src/sys/kern/kern_subr.c 1.31.2.3 src/sys/miscfs/procfs/procfs_dbregs.c 1.4.2.4 src/sys/miscfs/procfs/procfs_fpregs.c 1.11.2.4 src/sys/miscfs/procfs/procfs_regs.c 1.10.2.4 src/sys/miscfs/procfs/procfs_rlimit.c 1.5.2.1 src/sys/miscfs/procfs/procfs_status.c 1.20.2.5 src/sys/sys/uio.h 1.11.2.2 RELENG_5_1 src/UPDATING 1.251.2.11 src/sys/conf/newvers.sh 1.50.2.11 src/sys/fs/procfs/procfs_dbregs.c 1.22.2.1 src/sys/fs/procfs/procfs_fpregs.c 1.28.2.1 src/sys/fs/procfs/procfs_regs.c 1.27.2.1 src/sys/fs/pseudofs/pseudofs_vnops.c 1.35.2.1 src/sys/kern/kern_subr.c 1.74.2.1 src/sys/sys/uio.h 1.27.2.1 etc. ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Barney Wolff http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf I'm available by contract or FT, in the NYC metro area or via the 'Net.Received on Fri Oct 03 2003 - 16:45:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:24 UTC