Re: ipnat memory leak?

From: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles_at_skynet.be>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 02:51:26 +0200
At 6:37 PM -0600 2003/10/09, Vector wrote:

>                                              However, as soon as I put it in
>  the kernel, ipnat -l and ipnat -t became my best friends.  They are
>  incredibly useful.

	Okay, now that you explain it that way, it makes sense.

	That was very interesting to read.  Thank you!

-- 
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles_at_skynet.be>

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
     -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.

GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
Received on Thu Oct 09 2003 - 16:10:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:24 UTC