Re: More ULE bugs fixed.

From: Daniel Eischen <eischen_at_vigrid.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 15:17:22 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:

> On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 15 Oct 2003, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> >
> > > I fixed two bugs that were exposed due to more of the kernel running
> > > outside of Giant.  ULE had some issues with priority propagation that
> > > stopped it from working very well.
> > >
> > > Things should be much improved.  Feedback, as always, is welcome.  I'd
> > > like to look into making this the default scheduler for 5.2 if things
> > > start looking up.  I hope that scares you all into using it more. :-)
> >
> > Before you do that, can you look into changing the scheduler
> > interfaces to address David Xu's concern with it being
> > suboptimal for KSE processes?
> 
> Certainly, it may not happen if I can't find out what's making things so
> jerky for gnome/kde users.  If it looks like it will, I'll investigate the
> kse issues.

Thanks, I appreciate it.

-- 
Dan Eischen
Received on Wed Oct 15 2003 - 10:17:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:25 UTC