Re: __fpclassifyd problem

From: John Angelmo <john_at_adminforum.se>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 22:57:44 +0200
Kris Kennaway wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 09:08:25PM +0200, John Angelmo wrote:
> 
>>Hello
>>
>>I'm trying to install java-checkstyle on my 5.1 system, the system is 
>>upto date (p10) but I get this build error:
>>
>>===[root] /usr/ports/java/java-checkstyle # make
>>===>  Extracting for java-checkstyle-3.1
>>
>>>>Checksum OK for checkstyle-src-3.1.tar.gz.
>>
>>===>  Patching for java-checkstyle-3.1
>>===>   java-checkstyle-3.1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/ant - found
>>===>   java-checkstyle-3.1 depends on file: 
>>/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.3.1/bin/java - found
>>===>  Configuring for java-checkstyle-3.1
>>===>  Building for java-checkstyle-3.1
>>/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/libm.so.2: Undefined symbol 
>>"__fpclassifyd"
>>*** Error code 1
>>
>>Stop in /usr/ports/java/java-checkstyle.
>>
>>
>>What I understand is that the problem is that I can have some stale libs 
>>in /usr/lib
>>how can I solve this?
> 
> 
> This symbol is defined in libc.so.5.  One way you can see this problem
> is if you are running a 4.x binary that links to libm.so.2 on a 5.x
> system, because libm has the same version number in 5.x but is not
> binary compatible.  So the 4.x binary links to libc.so.4 and
> libm.so.2, and the latter is actually a 5.x library that expects to
> have __fpclassifyd resolved by linking with libc.so.5.  Is it the case
> on your system that you have old 4.x binaries installed?
> 

Yes I upgraded from 4.8 to 5.1
I now have compat4 installed to

/John
Received on Sun Oct 19 2003 - 11:58:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:25 UTC