On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, Jon Mini wrote: > Jeff Roberson [jroberson_at_chesapeake.net] wrote : > > > On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Bruce Evans wrote: > > > > How would one test if it was an improvement on the 4BSD scheduler? It > > is not even competitive in my simple tests. > > What were your simple tests? Er, they were in the original mail. Just do parts of buildworld with -j16 on an SMP system. ULE was 2.4 times slower for make depend and 2.1 times slower for make obj. Something must have been very wrong, since make obj, especially, should be completely i/o bound so it shouldn't be affected by the scheduler. Also, run a bunch of CPU hog processes with various nicenesses and look at top output to check that they are given reasonable amounts of CPU. BruceReceived on Sun Oct 26 2003 - 23:46:39 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:26 UTC