Sam Leffler wrote: > Any chance you can get a stack trace the next time this happens? The LOR by > itself is hard to go from... Hi Sam, i get a slightly different LOR. lock order reversal 1st 0xc2dd6c90 rtentry (rtentry) _at_ /space/src/sys/net/route.c:182 2nd 0xc2d4887c radix node head (radix node head) _at_ /space/src/sys/net/route.c:544 Stack backtrace: backtrace(c0681530,c2d4887c,c06870aa,c06870aa,c0687100) at backtrace+0x17 witness_lock(c2d4887c,8,c0687100,220,1) at witness_lock+0x672 _mtx_lock_flags(c2d4887c,0,c0687100,220,cf428938) at _mtx_lock_flags+0xba rtrequest1(1,cf428944,cf428998,0,c2eb9eb0) at rtrequest1+0x59 rtrequest(1,c2eb9eb0,c2eb9eb0,cf42899c,405) at rtrequest+0x4a in6_ifloop_request(1,c2eb9e00,0,c2eb9e00,40) at in6_ifloop_request+0x76 in6_ifaddloop(c2eb9e00,0,c2eb9e00,0,cf428cbc) at in6_ifaddloop+0x50 in6_ifinit(c2ce7408,c2eb9e00,cf428c64,1,c04e092b) at in6_ifinit+0x147 in6_update_ifa(c2ce7408,cf428c54,0,0,cf428af4) at in6_update_ifa+0x500 in6_control(c2ea2800,8078691a,cf428c54,c2ce7408,c2e0c130) at in6_control+0x731 ifioctl(c2ea2800,8078691a,cf428c54,c2e0c130,c2e9e7fc) at ifioctl+0x1c8 soo_ioctl(c2e02f68,8078691a,cf428c54,c2e06a00,c2e0c130) at soo_ioctl+0x19c ioctl(c2e0c130,cf428d10,c069ca3f,3ed,3) at ioctl+0x475 syscall(2f,2f,2f,8097785,8078691a) at syscall+0x2c0 Xint0x80_syscall() at Xint0x80_syscall+0x1d --- syscall (54), eip = 0x2828768f, esp = 0xbfbff4ec, ebp = 0xbfbff518 --- hth, floReceived on Wed Oct 29 2003 - 03:46:21 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:26 UTC