Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 03:28:32PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > > >>I just tried running the Diablo JDK under -current from yesterday (with >>the libm fix from a few days ago). It does not look good; possibly an >>issue with both the compat libc and native libc being linked in? Maybe >>libm.so is still bringing in the native libc.so? We don't install the >>4.x libm into compat, and I don't have any 4.x machine around to steal it >>from, so I can't test out that theory. > > > With help from peter and dwhite, we tracked down the cause to the following: > > ./jdk131.patches:+ dlMain = dlopen("/usr/lib/libc.so", RTLD_LAZY); > ./jdk131.patches:+ void *dlMain = dlopen("/usr/lib/libc.so", RTLD_LAZY); > > Java people, this is the cause of the binary incompatibility of 4.x > java binaries on 5.x. Can someone please fix? > > Kris Thanks for tracking this down. ScottReceived on Wed Oct 29 2003 - 19:06:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:27 UTC