Re: /lib symlinks problem?

On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 10:10:49PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 05:52:24PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > > I might be missing an obvious, but I just don't see a reason
> > > > why we should use relative linking here: we should just link
> > > > to where we really install.  With the attached patch, I get:
> ...
> > +.if ${LIBDIR} != ${SHLIBDIR}
> > +	ln -fs ${SHLIBDIR}/${SHLIB_NAME} ${DESTDIR}${LIBDIR}/${SHLIB_LINK}
> 
> Why are we making *any* symlinks here??

It was before we corrected ld(1) to look in /lib. I'm happy with
removing them now that it has been corrected.

-gordon