Re: problems with_dynamicroot =yes/noshared=no ?

From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 23:02:11 +0300
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 09:32:51PM +0200, masta_at_yazzy.org wrote:
> Hello friends,
> 
> I'm seeing a weird issue with my recent build, here goes:
> 
> shiba# ls -ld /lib
> drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel  1024 Sep  7 01:53 /lib
> shiba# ls -lh /lib/libc.so.5
> -r--r--r--  1 root  wheel    862K Sep  7 01:50 /lib/libc.so.5
> shiba# ls -lh /usr/lib/libc.so.5
> -r--r--r--  1 root  wheel    875K Jul  6 19:53 /usr/lib/libc.so.5
> shiba# ldd /sbin/init
> /sbin/init:
>         libutil.so.3 => /usr/lib/libutil.so.3 (0x28076000)
>         libcrypt.so.2 => /usr/lib/libcrypt.so.2 (0x28082000)
>         libc.so.5 => /usr/lib/libc.so.5 (0x2809b000)
> 
> Nothing in my /bin or /sbin is linked to anything in /lib. =(
> My environment is a jail where I use NOSHARED=NO, and WITH_DYNAMICROOT.
> At first I though my init was linking to stuff in /usr/lib for
> compatibility, but libc is not a symbolic link, so this is not a
> compatability-link issue. My working theory thus far is that maybe
> NOSHARED=NO might be interfearing with WITH_DYNAMICROOT, but I'm not sure
> how to find out if that is true/false. Anybody know what is going on?
> 
Most probably, you forgot to upgrade your /etc/rc.d/ldconfig.
Check with ``ldconfig -r'', the ``search directories: '' should
start with ``/lib:/usr/lib''.

Also, the latest bsd.lib.mk,v 1.154 takes care of removing
stale /usr/lib/libfoo.so.X libraries.


Cheers,
-- 
Ruslan Ermilov		Sysadmin and DBA,
ru_at_sunbay.com		Sunbay Software Ltd,
ru_at_FreeBSD.org		FreeBSD committer

Received on Sun Sep 07 2003 - 11:03:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:21 UTC