It seems Soren Schmidt wrote: > Forget that, wrong patch, here goes the right one: DOH! things are not going weel this morning, this patch should be right: Index: ata-lowlevel.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-lowlevel.c,v retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -r1.10 ata-lowlevel.c --- ata-lowlevel.c 8 Sep 2003 08:36:46 -0000 1.10 +++ ata-lowlevel.c 8 Sep 2003 09:47:14 -0000 _at__at_ -772,7 +772,10 _at__at_ struct ata_channel *ch = request->device->channel; int resid; - if (ch->flags & ATA_USE_16BIT || (size % sizeof(int32_t))) + if ((!(request->flags & ATA_R_ATAPI) && + (request->u.ata.command == ATA_ATA_IDENTIFY || + request->u.ata.command == ATA_ATAPI_IDENTIFY)) || + ch->flags & ATA_USE_16BIT || (size % sizeof(int32_t))) ATA_IDX_INSW_STRM(ch, ATA_DATA, (void*)((uintptr_t)request->data+request->donecount), size / sizeof(int16_t)); -SørenReceived on Mon Sep 08 2003 - 00:48:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:21 UTC