Liew Jay Sern wrote: > I missed BSDcon 03, what's a bikeshed got to do with anything, anyway? > (besides bikes). Let's see if I remember the story correctly: If you were building a nuclear reactor, your board of directors would likely agree with you on just about anything you tried to do, since a nuclear reactor is a complex, dangerous, difficult-to-build thing, that none of them wants to get into the dirty details, and there's enough for everyone to do anyway. If you were building a bikeshed, it's so simple, that having a number of people involved would cause endless arguments over things such as the color, or exact location of the bikeshed, since a bikeshed is simple enough that everyone understands it, and there's not really enough work for many people to be involved. The theory (I guess) being that people like to get involved. In a business atmosphere, the lesson is don't assign too many people to a project, it doesn't speed it up, it slows it down. In a volunteer project, where everyone is free to do what they want, it's too easy for too many people to focus on the easy parts, thus discussing petty details into the ground. Thus "building a bikeshed" has become a euphamism for discussing relatively unimportant details into the ground. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.comReceived on Sat Sep 13 2003 - 06:05:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:22 UTC