At 4:47 PM -0700 2003/09/17, Doug White wrote: > This came up at the developer summit. We do need to upgrade/make > significant changes to gdb for it to understand threaded debugging. The > panics might be interesting as it might be tickling other issues, but > before we can really debug threaded apps we need a new gdb. Do we need a rewritten gdb, or can we have both the current gdb and a new tgdb for debugging the threaded stuff? The latter approach seems to be something that would be a lot easier to integrate without risk of breaking anything currently existing, and tgdb could even be done as a port until such time as it's fully ready to take over from the built-in gdb in the system. -- Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles_at_skynet.be> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania. GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+ !w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++) tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)Received on Thu Sep 18 2003 - 12:03:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:22 UTC