Re: acd0 vs cd0 (ATAPICAM)

From: Thomas Quinot <thomas_at_FreeBSD.ORG>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 11:42:26 +0200

Le 2003-09-19, Guillaume écrivait :

> Thanks for the patch. cd0 is faster now and ATAPICAM works great.

That's good news!

> Are you going to commit the patch?

Yes, the patch is currently being reviewed.

-- 
    Thomas.Quinot_at_Cuivre.FR.EU.ORG

Received on Fri Sep 19 2003 - 00:42:28 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Paul Richards: "Re: Base packaging"
Previous message: Peter Jeremy: "Re: 4.9 stability update"
In reply to: Guillaume: "Re: acd0 vs cd0 (ATAPICAM)"
Next in thread: Thomas Quinot: "Re: acd0 vs cd0 (ATAPICAM)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:22 UTC