On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 04:36:32PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 06:21:52PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 05:51:25PM +0200, Jan Srzednicki wrote: > > > > > > Anyway, here's backtrace for atapicam panic I've mentioned. It's > > > triggered by: > > > > > > cdrecord dev=1,1,0 /some/track > > > > > > > This panic isn't ATAPICAM related. Could you try the patch below? It's > > against the cdrtools-devel port but should also work with the cdrtools > > port. > > Isn't it still a kernel bug if a user process can trigger a panic? > Yes, it seems to be a bug in the mlockall(2) implementation. Backing it out or hindering cdrecord to use it avoids the panic. I already wrote an email to bms_at_ who commited the mlockall(2) and munlockall(2) support regarding this issue. The patch for the cdrtools ports is only a workaround until the real cause is fixed. I also was not sure if it would work for Bryan as I originally didn't get the same panic as he did.Received on Fri Sep 19 2003 - 15:17:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:23 UTC