In message: <20030920175306.Q9576_at_znfgre.qbhto.arg> Doug Barton <DougB_at_freebsd.org> writes: : I'd really like to see this change backed out, at minimum until the : ports freeze is over. Me too. I'd like to see a discussion of this in arch_at_ as well. I know that people have a low bikeshed tolerance these days, but this is a really big change and should be talked about first. We've retained much less widely used interfaces for compatibility for a year or two at times, yet -pthread was removed with little or no discussion. That doesn't seem right to me. It would be one thing if FreeBSD were the only os using it, but it appears that everybody else that supports threads uses it, and making FreeBSD the odd man out seems a little extreme unless there's some big gain that I've overlooked. WarnerReceived on Sat Sep 20 2003 - 16:09:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:23 UTC