In message: <20030921022407.GA39970_at_rot13.obsecurity.org> Kris Kennaway <kris_at_obsecurity.org> writes: : 1) Put back -pthread in -current so all the ports don't fail I've been thinking about just doing that, but was holding off to make sure people had a chance to do this in the absense of dragging out a big stick. : 2) I will build a full set of -current packages with the -pthread : error still in place, to determine the list of packages that need to : be fixed (in fact I already have this, see : http://dosirak.kr.freebsd.org/errorlogs). : : 3) You, John Birrell, and whoever else is interested in fixing these : ports can work on them at your own pace without disrupting life for : the rest of the users. Once they're all fixed, we can turn the error : back on or make it a NOP or do whatever else is decided to be : appropriate. : : 4) It is likely that steps 2 and 3 will need to be iterated several : times, because there are dozens of ports that need to be fixed, and : many of them are hiding other ports that depend on them and also need : to be fixed. I think this is an excellent plan. WarnerReceived on Sat Sep 20 2003 - 17:40:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:23 UTC