Re: ports and -current

In message: <3F6DF274.3070805_at_acm.org>
            Tim Kientzle <kientzle_at_acm.org> writes:
: John Birrell wrote:
: > On Sat, Sep 20, 2003 at 08:06:25PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: >>At the very least, we should put [-pthread] back as a noop.  The timing on
: >>this really sucks because it breaks the ports tree for an extended
: >>period of time.  While the fixes are simple, they haven't been made
: >>yet.  The fact that the tree is frozen makes it seem like a really bad
: >>time to make the change.
: > 
: > 
: > Yes, I think it should go back as a noop (mostly to satisfy the GCC
: > people though).
: 
: Perhaps put it back as a noop with a particularly
: loud warning:
: 
: "Warning: -pthread does nothing.  If this is a port, complain to the 
: maintainer to fix it."

Maybe we should just stick to the plan that Kris and Daniel worked
out?

Warner