Re: ata-lowlevel.c ate my slave disc

On Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:24:00 +0200 (CEST)
Soren Schmidt <sos_at_spider.deepcore.dk> wrote:

> It seems Peter Wemm wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi, I want to report a regression in ATAng. It's exactly same problem
> > > that Richard Nyberg reported on current_at_ 9 days ago.
> > > 
> > > After updating to today -current, my system no longer see primary slave
> > > hard drive. It's one year old Seagate 80 GB hard drive.
> > 
> > FWIW, I have the same problem on my amd64 boxes at home.  It will not see
> > the drive if its in slave mode.  It too happens to be a seagate.
> > 
> > > If I revert a 1.10 revision of ata-lowlevel.c (#ifdef 0 a section of
> > > probing code), the disc is back and works absolutely fine.
> > 
> > I'll try the same later on.
> 
> I need the dmesg output from a verbose boot to get any further with this
> (of cause from an unpatched uptodate -current)
> 
> -S$Bxr(Ben

I have similar problem.
After suspend/resume, primary master drive has disappeared.
So I'm using with patch attached to this mail.
The notebook is TOSHIBA Libretto L5.

I'l attach dmesg log too.

--
Hiroyuki Aizu