Re: Something is wrong with the fxp network driver

This worked until I went beyond p4 on 5.1 release

I found a PR that suggested adding:
      { 0x1050,          "Intel 82801EB (ICH5) Pro/100 Ethernet" },

line to the if_fxp.c file, in the struct:
/*
  * Claim various Intel PCI device identifiers for this driver.  The
  * sub-vendor and sub-device field are extensively used to identify
  * particular variants, but we don't currently differentiate between
  * them.
  */
  static struct fxp_ident fxp_ident_table[] = {
     { 0x1029,           "Intel 82559 PCI/CardBus Pro/100" },
     { 0x1030,           "Intel 82559 Pro/100 Ethernet" },
     { 0x1031,           "Intel 82801CAM (ICH3) Pro/100 VE Ethernet" },
     { 0x1032,           "Intel 82801CAM (ICH3) Pro/100 VE Ethernet" },
     { 0x1033,           "Intel 82801CAM (ICH3) Pro/100 VM Ethernet" },
     { 0x1034,           "Intel 82801CAM (ICH3) Pro/100 VM Ethernet" },
     { 0x1035,           "Intel 82801CAM (ICH3) Pro/100 Ethernet" },
     { 0x1036,           "Intel 82801CAM (ICH3) Pro/100 Ethernet" },
     { 0x1037,           "Intel 82801CAM (ICH3) Pro/100 Ethernet" },
     { 0x1038,           "Intel 82801CAM (ICH3) Pro/100 VM Ethernet" },
     { 0x1039,           "Intel 82801DB (ICH4) Pro/100 VE Ethernet" },
     { 0x103A,           "Intel 82801DB (ICH4) Pro/100 Ethernet" },
     { 0x103B,           "Intel 82801DB (ICH4) Pro/100 VM Ethernet" },
     { 0x103C,           "Intel 82801DB (ICH4) Pro/100 Ethernet" },
     { 0x103D,           "Intel 82801DB (ICH4) Pro/100 VE Ethernet" },
     { 0x103E,           "Intel 82801DB (ICH4) Pro/100 VM Ethernet" },
     { 0x1050,          "Intel 82801EB (ICH5) Pro/100 Ethernet" },
     { 0x1059,           "Intel 82551QM Pro/100 M Mobile Connection" },
     { 0x1209,           "Intel 82559ER Embedded 10/100 Ethernet" },
     { 0x1229,           "Intel 82557/8/9 EtherExpress Pro/100(B) Ethernet" },
     { 0x2449,           "Intel 82801BA/CAM (ICH2/3) Pro/100 Ethernet" },
     { 0,                NULL },
  };

         -Derek


At 07:15 PM 9/26/2003 -0500, Derek Ragona wrote:
>Mine is an Intel® Server Board S875WP1-E, I was using a patch but it quite 
>working on the fxp0 interface.
>
>         -Derek
>
>
>At 08:07 PM 9/26/2003 -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
>>Are they Tyan motherboards by chance ? There was a thread in stable
>>about this a few weeks ago.  The problems seem specific to those
>>motherboards.  Someone posted a potential workaround as well.
>>
>>         ---Mike
>>
>>On Fri, 26 Sep 2003 11:40:08 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.current
>>you wrote:
>>
>> >I am having a problem with recent builds of -current with the fxp
>> >driver.  A couple of days ago, the 6 machines in my cluster with fxp
>> >interfaces all died at about the same time with fxp timeout errors.  The
>> >machines with 3Com xl interfaces kept on going. Today, I am observing
>> >that the throughput is about half of what I am seeing on my machines
>> >with a 3Com xl interface.  Is anybody else observing this?  What other
>> >information do I need to provide?
>> >
>> >Thanks.
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
>>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
>>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"
>