Re: procfs problem

From: Jason Stone <freebsd-current_at_dfmm.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> > > JM>map02# strace -p 730
> > > JM>strace: open("/proc/...", ...): No such file or directory
> > > JM>trouble opening proc file
> >
> > > You must mount procfs.
> > >
> > > # fstab;
> > > proc			/proc		procfs	rw		0	0
> >
> > The bi-weekly status messages have been claiming that all the common
> > debugging tools except for truss have been converted to work without
> > procfs, since procfs is now deprecated.  Does that not include strace, or
> > is there something else wrong here?
>
> strace is not part of FreeBSD.

Oh - I didn't think that truss was either, which lead me to believe that
someone had gone through ports and fixed a bunch of them.

Is someone working on fixing the strace and truss ports yet?  Are there
other popular ports that depend on procfs?


 -Jason

 --------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Freud himself was a bit of a cold fish, and one cannot avoid the suspicion
 that he was insufficiently fondled when he was an infant.
	-- Ashley Montagu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)
Comment: See https://private.idealab.com/public/jason/jason.gpg

iD8DBQE/eLTxswXMWWtptckRAtTdAKCiiZ1ffDqyLx0ZdT8pKEGmv1LX/wCgrTbx
M3/ZMG8QAIivfTdyfm3zNWM=
=s77n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Mon Sep 29 2003 - 13:41:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:24 UTC