On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 08:55:49AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 03:57:58PM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > I have ported over the bridging code from NetBSD and am looking for feedback. > > My main question is, 'do people want this in the tree?' > > > > > > The benefits over the current bridge are: > > * ability to manage the bridge table > > * spanning tree support > > * the snazzy brconfig utility > > * clonable pseudo-interface (is that a benefit?) > > > What advantages does it offer compared to the ng_bridge(4) functionality? > I didnt know about that one, I guess the main advantage is that all three *BSDs would have the same code and interface. While I imported it from NetBSD, it originated in OpenBSD. Thats assuming anyone cares about that sort of thing. AndrewReceived on Fri Apr 16 2004 - 21:03:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:51 UTC