Re: RFC: ported NetBSD if_bridge

From: Robert Watson <rwatson_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 13:29:07 -0400 (EDT)
On Sat, 17 Apr 2004, Robert Watson wrote:

> On 17 Apr 2004, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> 
> > They're referring to IEEE 802.1d.  This is an important feature for
> > building large bridged networks. 
> 
> And it's an important part of many ethernet-layer redundancy solutions,
> since it allows fail-over when one bridging element or graph edge goes
> offline.  It's something we really missed in some research work I was
> working on to build link layer filters, since it was an easy way to
> provide basic fail-over in the presence of ethernet link failures (and
> they happen a lot!) 

Just as a followup for those not familiar with spanning tree in the
context of ethernet, here's a URL in one of Cisco's product manuals:

  http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat5000/rel_5_2/config/spantree.htm

It talks a bit about how the spanning tree algorithm applies to ethernet,
and applications of spanning tree.

Robert N M Watson             FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects
robert_at_fledge.watson.org      Senior Research Scientist, McAfee Research
Received on Sat Apr 17 2004 - 08:29:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:51 UTC