On Mon, 19 Apr 2004 01:36:27 -0700 Luigi Rizzo <rizzo_at_icir.org> wrote: > Ok i understand what is going on (thanks for the very detailed > report, btw) -- basically the code was trying to use > ifadd_byindex() after the information had been destroyed. > > I think the attached patch (basically mving a block of code down > in if_detach) should fix the problem. > > Actually I believe this particular chunk of code should be moved > even further down, possibly right before the final IF_AFDATA_UNLOCK(), > because you cannot tell, a-priori, what information on the device > the lower level routines expect to use, so zeroing the ifindex_table[] > or calling destroy_dev() too early is probably a bug. > > If you can try it (in the proposed form, or moving it at the end > of if_detach) and let me khow how it works for you, i can commit > the fix. Hi, thanks. I will try it as soon as I return home (in around 8 hours), and report back then. Regards, AndreasReceived on Sun Apr 18 2004 - 23:51:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:51 UTC