Re: RFC: ported NetBSD if_bridge

From: Roman Kurakin <rik_at_cronyx.ru>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 13:53:36 +0400
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:

>On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 12:10:44AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
>J> Do we need THREE bridging systems?
>J> If you need features you culd probably add them pretty easily to one or
>J> the other of the existing bridging modules..
>
>  Why having three alternatives is bad?  We do have ipfw/ipf/pf and everyone
>is happy. We do have ppp/pppd/ng_ppp (the latter is useless without mpd) and
>  
>
You've forgotten about sppp/ng_sppp (for sync adapters) :-)

rik

>many people use all of them.
>  The above question is not about bridges, but it is more general.
>
>  
>
Received on Mon Apr 19 2004 - 00:56:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:51 UTC