Re: small note to GENERIC for isa dependency

From: Josef El-Rayes <josef_at_daemon.li>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:33:38 +0000
"M. Warner Losh" <imp_at_bsdimp.com>:
> And I do think there's code that unwisely assumes isa will always be
> there.

whats the sense of a removable option which will only result in a
broken kernel build, if it is removed? why not hide it or
make a note so no one tries to remove it?

-josef
-- 
Josef El-Rayes                   (__)
Email:	  josef_at_daemon.li     \\\'',) 
Web:	  http://daemon.li/     \/  \ ^
FreeBSD:  josef_at_FreeBSD.org     .\._/_)

Received on Wed Apr 21 2004 - 05:33:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:51 UTC