Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 3:09 PM -0500 4/21/04, Eric Anderson wrote: > >> Garance A Drosihn wrote: >> >> I suppose this is one of those "who needs files bigger than 2gb?" >> things.. > > > Perhaps, but as a general rule we'd like our system utilities to > at least *work* in extreme situations. This is something I'd > love to dig into if I had the time, but I'm not sure I have the > time right now. > I'm not sure how we can improve this situation. Considering that an `ls -l` is forced to stat every file, and store that info until the time comes to dump it to the tty for the human operator. The problem seems somewhat geometric, and un-fixable unless you want to find a way to page out the stat information of each file to a dump file of some sort, then cat that info back to the operator upon conclusion of the main loop. Even then, list 2 million files will be excesive just storing the file names for display. -JonReceived on Wed Apr 21 2004 - 11:46:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:52 UTC