On Thursday 22 April 2004 04:51 pm, Eirik Oeverby wrote: > Hi, > > I don't *have* anything on IRQ 20. > Here's the output of vmstat -i after >2 days uptime: > > [root_at_ranger] ~# vmstat -i > interrupt total rate > irq0: clk 22888351 99 > irq1: atkbd0 20530 0 > irq8: rtc 29298041 128 > irq9: acpi0 3902 0 > irq11: cbb0 cbb1+++ 203530 0 > irq12: psm0 117066 0 > irq13: npx0 1 0 > irq14: ata0 313747 1 > irq15: ata1 46 0 > Total 52845214 230 > [root_at_ranger] ~# uptime > 10:50PM up 2 days, 15:36, 5 users, load averages: 0.14, 0.14, 0.11 > > Note that this is *without* the suggested loader.conf option. Ok, this verifies that you aren't suffering from an interrupt storm at least. > /Eirik > > John Baldwin wrote: > > On Wednesday 21 April 2004 04:10 am, Eirik Oeverby wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>Yes I'm using ACPI. I assume that without ACPI things wouldn't work > >>overly well at all..? > >>When was this fix committed? I have a fairly recent kernel, too, see > >> below. > > > > do a 'vmstat -i' to see if you are getting an interrupt storm. If you > > have a very high count of interrupts on IRQ 20, add the > > 'hw.acpi.force_sci_lo' option to loader.conf as the previous poster said. -- John Baldwin <jhb_at_FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.orgReceived on Fri Apr 23 2004 - 09:08:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:52 UTC