With the recent patches to ata-lowlevel.c (v1.33 at this writing), verbose boot is showing this in the dmesg: [...] atapci0: <Intel PIIX4 UDMA33 controller> port 0xfff0-0xffff,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 2.1 on pci0 atapci0: Reserved 0x10 bytes for rid 0x20 type 4 at 0xfff0 atapci0: Reserved 0x8 bytes for rid 0x10 type 4 at 0x1f0 atapci0: Reserved 0x1 bytes for rid 0x14 type 4 at 0x3f6 ata0: reset tp1 mask=03 ostat0=50 ostat1=00 ata0-master: stat=0x50 err=0x01 lsb=0x00 msb=0x00 ata0-slave: stat=0x00 err=0x01 lsb=0x00 msb=0x00 ata0: reset tp2 mask=03 stat0=50 stat1=00 devices=0x1<ATA_MASTER> ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata0: [MPSAFE] atapci0: Reserved 0x8 bytes for rid 0x18 type 4 at 0x170 atapci0: Reserved 0x1 bytes for rid 0x1c type 4 at 0x376 ata1: reset tp1 mask=03 ostat0=50 ostat1=00 ata1-master: stat=0x00 err=0x01 lsb=0x14 msb=0xeb <-- Magic Numbers for ATAPI device ata1-slave: stat=0x01 err=0x00 lsb=0x00 msb=0x00 \ <----------///////////////// [...^v^v^v^ repeats 30 seconds' worth ^v^v^v^...] < <---------<<< looping <<< ata1-slave: stat=0x01 err=0x00 lsb=0x00 msb=0x00 / <----------\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ ata1: reset tp2 mask=01 stat0=00 stat1=81 devices=0x4<ATAPI_MASTER> ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 ata1: [MPSAFE] [...] The 'atacontrol list' shows: ATA channel 0: Master: ad0 <IBM-DTTA-371010/T77IA73A> ATA/ATAPI revision 4 Slave: no device present ATA channel 1: Master: acd0 <HL-DT-ST RW/DVD GCC-4120B/2.02> ATA/ATAPI revision 0 Slave: no device present The 'atacontrol mode 0' shows: Master = UDMA33 Slave = BIOSPIO The 'atacontrol mode 1' shows: Master = WDMA2 Slave = BIOSPIO With this new info, we can see that we are getting the ATAPI_MAGIC_* numbers from the secondary channel (still connected only to the LG Combo as Master, no Slaves at all anywhere). The code turns on 'ch->devices |= ATA_ATAPI_MASTER;' at this point and continues. We see different stat1 values afterwards, when checking for slave on secondary. It seems stat1 is not checked against ATA_S_ERROR at this point. How can we do this properly so it'd work for everyone? Also should I figure out why tp2 on primary channel ends up with mask=03, with no slaves at all anywhere? Or is this a common assumption being made? ? ? ? ? -- thx, Paul Seniura.Received on Tue Apr 27 2004 - 10:16:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:52 UTC