In message: <6695.1083331489_at_critter.freebsd.dk> "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk> writes: : In message <20040430.070341.26991317.imp_at_bsdimp.com>, "M. Warner Losh" writes: : >In message: <5473.1083327210_at_critter.freebsd.dk> : > "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk> writes: : >: >Should I mount /var/chroot/dev as type devfs? : >: : >: Yes: : >: : >: mount -t devfs randomargument /var/chroot/dev : > : >What if I have hundreds of these chroots? We build our product inside : >a chroot right now and I'm worried what the overhead of : >mounting/unmounting this for every build would be... : : As far as I recall, our mountlist handling is not optimised for : hundreds of simultaneous mountpoints: we basically walk the list. : That said, I belive we only do so during the actual mount/unmount : operations, so I do not think there is a performance issue as such. Would the performance issues be mitigated by mounting/unmounting devfs all the time? Eg, only mount it while it is actively being used? Also, the devices that the chroot needs to access are best characterized as simple: null, random, tty. It looks like most of the issues can be delt with, but like you say, there appear to be problems with things like /dev/tty. One alternative would be to tar up /dev and extract it into the chroot. However, this appears to have problems with /dev/tty being wrong for users on other ttys. I've not yet investigated the problems that might accrue with things like ptys and people doing a chroot outside of the build system. WarnerReceived on Fri Apr 30 2004 - 04:54:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:37:52 UTC