David G. Lawrence wrote: > > Well...the SUSv2 specification for tar may not have been the best standard > to adhere to. The change of behavior for the 'l' option on create is going > to seriously bite a lot of people because it majorly affects what is > archived. I'm reluctant to contradict the one serious attempt to standardize tar simply because gtar ignored that effort. I would rather just disable the -l option entirely; that way, people would get an error message instead of having the tar program behave unexpectedly. Would you be happier with this behavior? $ tar -cl /foo Error: -l is ambiguous If you want GNU tar -l, use --one-file-system instead. If you want POSIX tar -l, use --link-warn instead. TimReceived on Sun Aug 01 2004 - 23:31:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:04 UTC