On Wednesday 04 August 2004 10:43 am, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 10:21:01AM +0100, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 01:43:54 -0600 (MDT) > > > > Scott Long <scottl_at_FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > | Source upgrade | Not done | David Schultz | problematic. The > > > | | incompatibility | | | 5.3 world > > > | sources | > > > | > > > | | | | must be buildable > > > | | | | | and installable > > > | | | | | from a 5.2.1 > > > | | | | | system. > > > | | | | | > > > > Should they not also be buildable and installable from a 4.10 or 4.11 > > system in order to preserve the -stable upgrade route ? > > I believe this item is not about builds/installs, but about the API > compatibility of libm.so. s/API/ABI/ -- John Baldwin <jhb_at_FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.orgReceived on Wed Aug 04 2004 - 16:00:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:04 UTC