On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 01:16:37PM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote: > On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 12:50:48PM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 08:03:00PM +0200, Max Laier wrote: > > > On Wednesday 04 August 2004 15:05, Divacky Roman wrote: > > > > struct pf_altq *altq, *a; > > > > > > > > if (pa->ticket != ticket_altqs_inactive) { > > > > error = EBUSY; > > > > break; > > > > } > > > > altq = pool_get(&pf_altq_pl, PR_NOWAIT); > > > > ^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > shouldnt this be initalized to NULL? at least its not nice to have it > > > > uninitalized... > > > > > > hum? > > > $ cd /usr/src/sys/contrib/pf/net && grep pf_altq_pl * > > > <...> > > > pf_ioctl.c: pf_state_pl = pf_altq_pl = pf_pooladdr_pl = NULL; > > > pf_ioctl.c: UMA_DESTROY(pf_altq_pl); > > > pf_ioctl.c: UMA_CREATE(pf_altq_pl, struct pf_altq, "pfaltqpl"); > > > <...> > > > > > > Or what are you thinking about? > > > > pf/net/pf_ioctl.c:2032 and below > > > > hm... I got it wrong. I looked at it again and I changed type with variable > > name ;( > > > > hysteria.sk/~neologism/NEOLOGISM is my kernel config > > hysteria.sk/~neologism/pf.conf is my whole pf config > > > > I am compiling kernel with -Os (I know its not supported) I'll try with plain > > -O > > > > btw: why does the malloc has to be NOWAIT? > > kernel compiled with -O and M_WAITOK doesnt help either the problem is that I didnt have ALTQ_RED in my kernel config (thnx Pyun YongHyeon) should it be announced a more friendly way? romanReceived on Thu Aug 05 2004 - 09:50:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:04 UTC