Re: upgrade of file(1) to 4.10 (including FreeBSD elf(5) fixes)

From: David O'Brien <obrien_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 02:07:40 -0700
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 08:31:15PM +0200, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
> As usual, file(1) has to follow. Anyway, since it works for now, and 
> currently there is no reason to break it, why is it bad? I actually like 
> that feature, and it is useful for debugging ports that should have been 
> recompiled after a system upgrade.

Sounds like you're trying to work around bugs in the Ports Collection,
please go fix those bugs and use the proper tool for the job.

-- 
-- David  (obrien_at_FreeBSD.org)
Received on Mon Aug 09 2004 - 07:09:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:05 UTC