On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 08:31:15PM +0200, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > As usual, file(1) has to follow. Anyway, since it works for now, and > currently there is no reason to break it, why is it bad? I actually like > that feature, and it is useful for debugging ports that should have been > recompiled after a system upgrade. Sounds like you're trying to work around bugs in the Ports Collection, please go fix those bugs and use the proper tool for the job. -- -- David (obrien_at_FreeBSD.org)Received on Mon Aug 09 2004 - 07:09:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:05 UTC