On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 13:45:52 +0000 (UTC) "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists_at_lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 13:21:01 +0000 (UTC) > > "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists_at_lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > > > > > > > I also had some problems with IPSEC and IPSEC_ESP, changing require > > > > > to use in the policies fixed that. With require racoon was not able > > > > > to initiate phase 1, because all non esp traffic was dropped. > > > > > > whyever I hadn't seen this posting. > > > > Did you noticed Message-Id: > > <20040805223027.7df0732b_at_Magellan.Leidinger.net> on -current? > > I had seen that mail but I cannot see this paragraph in there. anyway.. It's another thread without any discussion. > > > > I think this is a datapoint... I use a "require" policy too. ATM I can't > > > > test with "use" instead. > > > > > > but this problem had been fixed months ago for IPSEC. > > > > Any other idea for the cause of the observed behavior? > > which on ? use vs. require ? I think this is just not HEAD. In my case it's -current from Jul 18. > your problem: do you really need gif(4) ? if yes - what for ? In my case the problem doesn't matter, since using FAST_IPSEC works for me. But I think it should be fixed for 5.3. As you can see in the above mentioned mail, I converted a 4.x system to -current. On 4.x I've used gif for a tunnel (as documented in the handbook) between the FreeBSD system and a VPN appliance which isn't under my control. Is there another way to setup a tunnel in -current? Bye, Alexander. -- I'm available to get hired (preferred in .lu). http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander _at_ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7Received on Mon Aug 09 2004 - 12:11:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:05 UTC