On 2004-08-13T17:19:40-0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Fri, 2004-08-13 at 17:06, Michael W. Oliver wrote: > > At first, I didn't have 'io' or 'mem' in my kernel config file, and xorg > > complained about missing /dev/io. So, not knowing that I needed 'mem', > > too, I added 'io' to my kernel config file and rebuilt/installed. After > > reboot, xorg then complained about missing /dev/vga. This stumped me, > > so I went to cvsweb and compared the GENERIC that my customer kernel was > > based on versus the latest GENERIC to see what "GENERIC" stuff I was > > missing. The only thing that was missing was 'mem'. So, I added mem, > > did the dance again, and now xorg works like a champ. > > > > FYI, even with 'io' and 'mem' in my kernel, there is still no /dev/vga, > > but xorg doesn't seem to mind anymore. > > I haven't gone through the code, but I'm assuming that /dev/vga on > something (linux?) provides the capabilities that the normal /dev/io > did, and it was trying to use that as a fallback. The error, rather > than saying "your /dev/io or /dev/vga are missing" only reported the > last one. I wouldn't know what I was looking at if I did look at the code, but xorg did complain about missing /dev/io before I added 'io' to the kernel config. Then, xorg complained about missing /dev/vga. So, it seems to me that adding 'io' fixed the 'missing /dev/io' message, and adding 'mem' fixed the 'missing /dev/vga' issue, with regards to xorg. You guys are teaching me a lot! :) -- Mike perl -e 'print unpack("u","88V]N=&%C=\"!I;F9O(&EN(&AE861E<G,*");'
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:06 UTC