Re: New nvidia drivers available

From: Doug Rabson <dfr_at_nlsystems.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2004 15:53:32 +0100
On Sunday 15 August 2004 15:03, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Doug Rabson wrote:
> > On Sunday 15 August 2004 14:47, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > > On Sun, 15 Aug 2004, Doug Rabson wrote:
> > > > > Same error message here when starting neverball. If I map
> > > > > libpthread->libc_r it's working again.
> > > > >
> > > > > xawtv also stopped working. Fortunately setting -xvport
> > > > > manually did fix that.
> > > >
> > > > This might be because libGL calls libpthread's version of
> > > > open() before libpthread has initialised properly. This patch
> > > > might fix it - it fixes neverball's map compiler for me but I
> > > > haven't actually run neverball itself.
> > > >
> > > > Index: thr_open.c
> > > > ===============================================================
> > > >==== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/lib/libpthread/thread/thr_open.c,v
> > > > retrieving revision 1.16
> > > > diff -u -r1.16 thr_open.c
> > > > --- thr_open.c	9 Dec 2003 02:20:56 -0000	1.16
> > > > +++ thr_open.c	15 Aug 2004 09:19:42 -0000
> > > > _at__at_ -45,11 +45,15 _at__at_
> > > >  int
> > > >  __open(const char *path, int flags,...)
> > > >  {
> > > > -	struct pthread *curthread = _get_curthread();
> > > > +	struct pthread *curthread;
> > > >  	int	ret;
> > > >  	int	mode = 0;
> > > >  	va_list	ap;
> > > >
> > > > +	if (_thr_initial == NULL)
> > > > +		_libpthread_init(NULL);
> > > > +
> > > > +	curthread = _get_curthread();
> > >
> > > I thought the C++ style constructor in thr_autoinit.c is supposed
> > > to take care of things like this?
> >
> > The problem is that there is no particular ordering for
> > constructors. In the case with neverball, the C++ constructor in
> > libGL which initialises OpenGL ran first and quite reasonably tried
> > to call open(2). This was intercepted by libpthread, which hadn't
> > yet had its constructor called.
>
> Is there something else we can do so that libpthread gets
> initialized first?  Use _init()?  I'm not sure how to
> not add that when building static libpthread though (let's
> kill static libpthread!).

There is no way other than putting a special case for pthread 
initialisation into rtld. The C++ constructor trick is implemented via 
_init anyway so that won't work either. 

I have the same problem initialising TLS in static programs. My TLS 
initialisation must run before pthread initialises so that I can 
allocate the correct sized blocks for pthread's main thread. I ended up 
hooking the TLS initialisation directly from crt1.c before calling 
_init.
Received on Sun Aug 15 2004 - 12:53:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:06 UTC