At Wed, 18 Aug 2004 00:02:44 -0400 (EDT), Robert Watson wrote: > Hmm. This code is somewhat more spaghetti than I thought. In the IPv4 > version, we check the return value of the notify function to decide if we > need to unlock. Something like the following may fix this: Okay, I'll try with your patch. > Do you have a dump for this? If so, is there any chance you could tell me > what function 'notify' was set to point to, and what the value of 'inp' is > there? Sorry, I didn't take a dump at this time. I'll take it when I get a panic next time. > in6_pcbnotify(c0709d40,e4d3abb0,1600,e4d3abd0,9bed) at in6_pcbnotify+0x26d Is "9bed" is the value of notify argument? It seems it is too small for function pointer... -- Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama_at_imgsrc.co.jp> // IMG SRC, Inc. <kuriyama_at_FreeBSD.org> // FreeBSD ProjectReceived on Wed Aug 18 2004 - 02:18:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:06 UTC