kqueue is safe to use?

On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 09:52:06PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Mark Johnston wrote this message on Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 20:29 -0500:
> > Here's this week's giant summary.  As you probably know, a code freeze went 
> > into effect first thing on the 17th, which is the main reason for the length 
> > of this summary.
> 
> Another change you forgot is that I commit patches to make kqueue safe
> to use on -current.  This has been a long outstanding problem with
> -current.
> 
Would the following be safe to commit now?

%%%
Index: Makefile
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/usr.bin/make/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.33
diff -u -r1.33 Makefile
--- Makefile	12 Aug 2004 11:49:55 -0000	1.33
+++ Makefile	18 Aug 2004 06:23:06 -0000
_at__at_ -18,11 +18,10 _at__at_
 CFLAGS+=-DMAKE_VERSION=\"5200408120\"
 .if defined(_UPGRADING)
 CFLAGS+=-D__FBSDID=__RCSID
+.else
+CFLAGS+=-DUSE_KQUEUE
 .endif
 
-# XXX: kernel currently broken
-# CFLAGS+=-DUSE_KQUEUE
-
 main.o: ${MAKEFILE}
 
 # Set the shell which make(1) uses.  Bourne is the default, but a decent
%%%


Cheers,
-- 
Ruslan Ermilov
ru_at_FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer