I guess that by having enough people bring up their concerns, I am hoping that such a change will be reconsidered... Without sounding too much like a broken record - separating packages from the base into a different partition is an asset I would much rather not loose. I believe many people have made a coherent enough argument that I wholehearedly agree with, but I'd just also like to add something I haven't seen (perhaps missed). I have a setup where an old slow NIS/NFS server provides a combination of /usr/local, /home, and swap for a bunch of even slower machines. The beauty of this setup is that as long as the software installed in /usr/local is built for the lowest common denominator processor (all are obviously x86) everything just works. And it works well. The scripts that run from /usr/local/etc/rc.d run exactly as expected, on all machines, and I am happy to only change them in one place to have the whole farm "just work". In all this, there is but one kludge - the dhcpd startup script just exits if run on any host other than the one hardcoded in the script. I would imagine that this setup is not unique to me - but it relies on having the startup scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d; I gladly accept criticism on this (e.g. this setup is dumb, here's a better way to do it) or explanations why startup scritps for packages in /etc will not break the setup above. But please don't offer me to also start NFS mounting /etc/local; /var/db/pkg is already annoying enough. MikeReceived on Tue Aug 17 2004 - 12:51:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:38:06 UTC